o Proximate causes: Π or injury too remote?
o IIED:
o Extreme and outrageous conduct
§ exceeding common bounds of decency
· fragile Π?
· common carrier?
· continuous?
o Intent to Cause Emotional Distress can be found where Δ
§ knows with substantial certainty the conduct will cause severe emotional distress or
§ acts w/reckless indifference to a high probability of this result.
o Causation
o Damages: severe emotional distress. physical harm is not required.
o Invasion of privacy
o Appropriation
§ unauthorized use of plaintiff’s picture or name
§ for defendant’s commercial advancement
o intrusion into Plaintiff’s seclusion
§ intrusion
· act of prying or
· intruding on Π’s affairs or seclusion of the plaintiff’s privacy (reas expectation of privacy
· objectionable to a reasonable party
§ the thing intruded upon must be private.
o False light: a prima facie case for false light requires Π prove
§ publication of facts
§ about Π
§ by Δ placing Π in a
· malice on the part of the Δ where the matter is in public interest
§ false light in the public eye
· false light must be objectionable to a reasonable person
o public disclosure of private facts
§ disclosure
· disclosure is objectionable to a reasonable person
§ private facts
§ to the public (a subst’l number of people)
· NEWSWORTHINESS DEFENSE
o DEFENSES
§ Consent and asb/qualified privilege
o Products liability: strict liability, negligence, intentional tort (battery, misrep), warranties (Express implied)
o strict liability: defective product, foreseeable plaintiff, duty to make safe, causation, damages
§ defective product and defect was there when left defendant’s control.
· manufacturing defect
o consumer expectation: product is dangerous beyond expectation of ordinary consumer
· design defect: all products of that model are defective
o consumer expectation
o feasibility of alternatives test: less dangerous design available and feasible
§ utility of product
§ feasibility of alt
§ magnitude of risk
§ knowledge of risk
· inadequate labeling: failure to adequately warn
§ duty to Π
§ duty to make safe
§ causation
§ Defenses
· contrib negligence is not a defense to products liability
o misuse of product is reasonably foreseeable
· assumption of risk
o know risk
o voluntarily assumed it
o causation issues
§ proximate cause:
· risk too remote
· reasonable foreseeable misuse of product
· Intermediary retailer or MD: negligent failure to discover or warn of a defect is not a superseding cause unless gross negligence
o Negligence
§ duty to take reasonable steps to mitigate damages
§ breach: balancing test
· easy to label, fix defect...
· risk and magnitude of injury
o intentional battery
§ harmful or offensive contact
§ intent/substantially certain
o intentional misrep
o warranties
§ express:
· no disclaimers to express warranties allowed
§ implied warranty of merchantability
· fit for ordinary purpose
o not fit w/o adequate label...
§ fit for partic purpose
· seller knows of purpose
· buyer relies
o defamation
o publication
o defamatory language
o of or concerning plaintiff
o damage
§ general damage to reputation presumed in libel and slander per se
· business/prof, chastity, disease, moral turp
§ special damages must be plead for regular slander
o constitutional limits
§ defendant must prove fault and falsity where public official or public matter concerned
· public official requires a showing of malice: reckless
· private person but public matter: negligence
o defenses
§ absolute privilege: judicial proceedings, legislative hearings, between spouses
§ qualified privilege: interest of recipient, records of public proceedings
· can’t abuse privilege
o malicious prosecution
o institution of criminal/civil proceedings
o for an improper purpose
o without probable cause/merit
o termination of proceedings in favor of Π
§ dismissal w/o prejudice?
o damages
o If coupled with PR
§ duty not to file a frivolous claim
·
o abuse of process
o wrongful use of process for
o ulterior purpose
o definite act or threat against π to accomplish purpose
o False Imprisonment
o Act of restraining Π
§ physical act
§ threat of harm
§ omission of act of release where duty to act: airplane, boat
o to a bounded area
§ no reasonable means of escape
o Π must be aware of confinement OR suffer injury as a result
o defense of shopkeeper’s privilege
§ reasonable manner, reasonable time, if reasonable belief that theft has occurred
o Negligence
o duty to whom: is Π too remote? public policy
o duty of care:
§ who is defendant? landowner, common carrier, professional
o breach:
§ neg per se
· statue: class of protected persons, class of harm
§ res ipsa:
· type of accident likely result of negl
· more likely that not it was negligence of this Δ
· no contributory negligence
o causation:
§ remoteness
§ superseding causes
o damages
§ actual: collateral source rule
§ causal
§ foreseeable: remoteness/superseding
§ unavoidable: duty to mitigate
No comments:
Post a Comment